....... Plato...at least say first who wrote it....who or what organisation he is part of and...that it is an opinion piece..
He is not involved in climate science....
If those, who dont believe , "the majority of scientific evidence that proves that human actions are the major cause of the present unusual climate change and potentially dangerous further changes.."
(.....especially given the current argument about airtime.....)
.........that they believe that they should( for some reason) have an equal amount of "air time" to those proven scientific sets of data.. then at the very least they should be reasonable and provable in what they wish to push into the debate...
NOT yet again a known set of disproved anti.....junk..
That is the very reason why publishing companies are pulling the pin on those types of "opinions"
Its a bit like giving equal time to someone suggesting that vaccinations or not smoking are a very bad idea.....compared to the obvious scientific proof to the contrary..
There is only two substances..stuff and glue...and even glue is made of stuff,,