Jump to content


Photo

New prop


  • Please log in to reply
114 replies to this topic

#111 Priscilla II

Priscilla II

    Advanced Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 110 posts

Posted 23 November 2017 - 04:25 PM

Chris ,did you check that the gearbox morse control cable correctly engages the gearbox, ie has sufficient throw.

I too have had some gearbox dramas post a recently completed self done diesel heart lung transplant.

Cone gearbox TMC40. 

Original gb ratio not correct so run in period consisted of inability to run up to correct revs, changed prop to seek a solution(easiest) but still had black bum, still not correct.

Changed gb ratio (always carry a spare gb :thumbup: ) and voila all was sorted, until at 200 hours gb failed to engage and drive in forward, removed and examined oil, metal in oil,bugger.

Changed out engine control morse cable etc, replaced gearbox as other one was toast and then paid very close attention to the engagement throw length.

Here is what I learnt, over my entire life I have had almost a obsessional aversion to paying anybody to do anything,so I tackle with a reasonably successful hit rate most of all life's tasks.

I now have a great respect for marine engineers and the contorted and complex environment they encounter daily.

My next boat will have the engine in the saloon and I will make the tea whilst the engineer goes about his business.

Part with the $$$ and pass the original problems ownership on to a professional.

Hah, wife has new car, I,m banned from lifting the bonnet.


  • 0

#112 mcp

mcp

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts

Posted 23 November 2017 - 06:50 PM

What are the ratings of the thrust bearings in the gearbox?  or are there actually thrust bearings in there?


  • 0

#113 Chrisc

Chrisc

    Advanced Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 604 posts
  • LocationWhangamata

Posted 27 November 2017 - 06:57 PM

So I hope this will be the final postscript to the whole sorry gearbox affair.
I mentioned in a couple of posts back that I was s bit suspicious of PRM in that whereas they had added a few new units to their stable of gearboxes over the years,the only one to be discontinued was the PRM 80 (mine) and which had been replaced by the PRM 90. Same external dimensions but with a slightly improved output.
Today I went to the supplier for some parts and the boss was not there but one of his mechanics was. In the course of an interesting conversation he mentioned that quite a few of the 80s had come back faulty over the last couple of years, all with the same problem. Slipping cones, so he said.
  • 0
Young at heart.
Other parts offered without warranty.

#114 wheels

wheels

    Advanced Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 15,890 posts

Posted 27 November 2017 - 07:11 PM

That makes a heck of a lot more sense to me Chris. Everything else has been well and truly ticked off as correctly down and met.
Any chance you can get them to cough up for a new 90?


  • 1

#115 Chrisc

Chrisc

    Advanced Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 604 posts
  • LocationWhangamata

Posted 27 November 2017 - 07:18 PM

I got an incredibly sharp price on the PRM 90 without even asking which did tend to fuel my suspicions of the 80 somewhat.
  • 2
Young at heart.
Other parts offered without warranty.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users