In a good investigation one would expect everyone involved would be subject to a look at what or how their actions contributed to or not too the end result. That would mean anyone could possibly be asked questions that may end in court, hence the use of the word 'potentially'.
So do you have a response to the question asked or do you intent to continue to duck, dive and blame everyone else?
Is that seriously your answer?
"Potentially" oh dear, that is very tenuous.
I agree with the rest of your statement, that in a good investigation etc etc, but again I've missed a fairly substantial point here. Andrew Little wasn't involved with the mine, not in running it, not in permitting it, not in regulating it. So how could he "potentially" risk a prosecution?
And just for fun (or a Friday challenge), I'm game to try and get a straight answer out of you.
KMM, do you enjoy drinking cold, fresh beer?