Jump to content


Photo

Queens Wharf Dolphins - Give us more ammo


  • Please log in to reply
233 replies to this topic

#231 splat

splat

    Advanced Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 164 posts

Posted 21 June 2019 - 11:20 AM

Yip points of law or error only...scope very important
  • 0

#232 Rehabilitated

Rehabilitated

    Rehabilitated

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 868 posts
  • Locationon the waters Land and else where

Posted 21 June 2019 - 12:35 PM

Rehab, No AC boats or AC marina will ever berth at the subject of this thread, take that AC stuff elsewhere please.

 

 

The Appeal process starts today. Team AYBA is there with a large group of other organisations from all over the city.   

 

Next time you see any AYBA committee, thank them for putting the time, effort and coin into helping us all retain the harbour.

 

AYBA = Auckland Yacht and Boating Association.

 

 

KM...MB

 

It is not Americas cup stuff. It is material for the environment court and mediation to consider that is entirely relevant. You asked for more ammo

 

The harbour is not being retained. It's being filled with concrete marinas and stuff. You cannot pick and choose who can pour concrete, push in piles, fingers, legs, moorings, extensions and who cannot into the harbour.

 

Guests also read this post, which could be all concerned.


  • 0

©  2013 2014 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019

 

RETIRED ADVANCING MULTIHULL, MONOHULL SAILOR, ORGANIZER , NAVIGATOR, PREVIOUS SKIPPER

OCEAN COASTAL WATERS COMBINED, CRUISER / RACER ADVANCING MEMBER.


#233 Knot Me... maybe

Knot Me... maybe

    Advanced Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6,115 posts

Posted 21 June 2019 - 03:09 PM

There is no need to retain, dredge or doing anything like that if they get the OK to build the wharf extension. 

If it gets built or not will not be influenced by the AC, it is not going to affect any plans for that.

So I can't see why anything AC will be of any concern to the EC.

 

But hey, ya never know.


  • 0

#234 Rehabilitated

Rehabilitated

    Rehabilitated

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 868 posts
  • Locationon the waters Land and else where

Posted 10 August 2019 - 01:48 PM

More on them here for those not up with it.  http://crew.org.nz/f...l=wynyard wharf

 

Basically the council is spending a huge pile to then try and spend a huge pile more to extend Queens Wharf by 90mts more out into the harbour. They are calling them Dolphins with a access gang plank. The gang plank is 2mts wide and has a pile of piles under it, it's no gangplank it's a jetty if not a wharf in it's own right. The story is the gang plank is access for the dock workers when line handling on arrival and departures.

 

The niggle is the council have been under pressure by the cruise lines to do this or they say 'we will not come to Akl if we have to hover mid stream'. All a little blackmail like considering the ships go to a huge pile of destinations where they can not berth along side, they decided to build massive ships for their own balance sheet and it goes a bit against the growing trend worldwide to limit the number of ship visits due to the fast expanding numbers of them, environmental concerns and a few other bits n bobs. Plus we all lose more of the harbour...again!!!!

 

We are talking the largest newer ships here, not most that do and have visited NZ.

 

In the councils 'extensive' consultation they spoke to some iwi's, the ferry operators and the harbour master. Hardly a representative group of harbour users. Recreational was never spoken to or considered, the report simply says 'It's inside an exclusion zone so recreational never go in there so we have no need to consider them' {translated from report speak}. At a meeting with Panuku I did point out it was plainly obvious the expensive report was written by someone who has never seen Auckland harbour.

 

It's now getting very serious and there is a big hearing next week. There is a group (a combination of the AYBA, AMUA, WMUA, PCC, RYC and Squaddy) who are sending representatives to speak to aspects of the proposal, along with other submitters of course. This group is against the plan and while not against ship visits we do not want to lose more harbour so we will be explaining why and presenting options that get the same end result but are less harbour invasive.

 

So tell us more about your opinions and thoughts on this. Give us more ammo.

 

 

KM,,,MB

 

It looks like they could be changing direction. Costs are spiralling vertically rapidly. The alternative costs probably matching the increase rate.

 

It probably means  AC and super yacht marina's cost are increasing / spiralling upwards at the same rate or higher and faster the costs, would not trust the report though. The report said they where only looking at it [ the alternative to move the cars from the wharf by barge, nothing definite re the dolphins except Goff's state and acknowledgement by P.O.A. So it has not been costed. Why not by cars haulers to some where else. Why Barge.

 

https://www.nzherald...jectid=12256972


  • 0

©  2013 2014 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019

 

RETIRED ADVANCING MULTIHULL, MONOHULL SAILOR, ORGANIZER , NAVIGATOR, PREVIOUS SKIPPER

OCEAN COASTAL WATERS COMBINED, CRUISER / RACER ADVANCING MEMBER.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users