harrytom 543 Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 would this debacle ever of happened if Blake was still around?? Know very that are interrsted in the cup since foiling came along and even less now its going offshore. Did watch the GPs in Denmark? far more interesting racing as its fleet racing. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
harrytom 543 Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 Watched on "Netfilx" The Australia 1983 campagin.Was it really the keel or did they manage to just get under Dens skin?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Black Panther 1,307 Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 I think the sails were a lot better. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jon 312 Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 Good doco, watched it a few weeks back, as BP said mostly better sails, if the keel was that good everyone would have gone that way no. what the keel did was get it’s centre of gravity a lot lower, as in the bulbs we see now on racing yachts. The old 12 metre yachts had a very high CoG 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Priscilla II 320 Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 14 hours ago, harrytom said: Watched on "Netfilx" The Australia 1983 campagin.Was it really the keel or did they manage to just get under Dens skin?? From SA post: ‘’The whole Australia II (A-II) package was incredible, from Benbobs innovation, Bertrands determination, Schnackenberg’s sails, Bondy’s money & foresight, plus a dedicated, talented and thoroughly professional crew. BUT, for my mind the reason A-II got up on the downwind leg allowing them win the race was an absolutely brilliant tactical call by the tactician Hugh Treharne. Hughie spotted the shift that DC didn’t, took the punt & gybed into it and then A-II were in front at the bottom mark. The rest is history. No amount of a “great package” could make up the large deficit at the top mark by boat speed alone. It was tactical… Side note about Hughie : A-II had a slight speed deficit downwind because their spinnakers were sub-par compared to Liberty’s. Hugh Treharne, a sail maker himself, eventually took over the spinnaker maintenance and spent many a night re-cutting all A-II kites, somehow making them more stable and draw better like Liberty’s were. A-II was notably faster down wind with his re-cut kites.’’ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Psyche 420 Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 you have to go the right way 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ex Elly 137 Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 Listen to the Tom Whidden podcast to get the other side of the story: https://shirleyrobertson.com/podcast/ He reckons that Australia had a faster boat, and should have won easily but were outsailed by USA, who won more starts and had better tactics. USA took a punt on a new designer, but when the boat was built it didn't measure, so they had to go back to NYYC to ask for more money. When the third boat was built it was no faster than their boat from the previous cup. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
harrytom 543 Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 Had A 2 not suffered steering and mainsail pin drop out might of been over quicker,Liked the NYC panick.Trying to pressure the Dutch in to say they invented the keel. I read with interest how Daltonb wants crawl and hold a series here before the Spanish event "Go F yourself"Dalton. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/exclusive-grant-dalton-wants-lead-in-americas-cup-event-in-auckland-seeks-council-meeting/WFATJGWBIHZTWPK6RYF2I7AVWA/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Leftred 26 Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 The Spanish team defending the America's Cup should be able to afford a pretty nice event in Auckland with all that extra sponsorship money they've opened up by moving to Europe right? Right? They're not going to expect a small city like Auckland no longer directly involved to pay, right? Right? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ex Elly 137 Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 18 hours ago, harrytom said: Trying to pressure the Dutch in to say they invented the keel. Yes, that sounded very underhanded. The way Tom Whidden tells it, the rule stated the keel had to be designed in competitors country, but Lexcen said he designed it in Holland. So maybe USA were right on that? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
harrytom 543 Posted September 28, 2022 Share Posted September 28, 2022 4 hours ago, ex Elly said: Yes, that sounded very underhanded. The way Tom Whidden tells it, the rule stated the keel had to be designed in competitors country, but Lexcen said he designed it in Holland. So maybe USA were right on that? Could be true https://www.smh.com.au/national/winged-keel-not-lexcens-design-dutch-architect-claims-20091013-gvnr.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
waikiore 279 Posted September 29, 2022 Share Posted September 29, 2022 I have done a (not exhaustive) study during the last 20 months and feel I have a reasonable understanding of the new language "Daltonese" When he says I want to talk to someone sensible at the council about an event here, translation is : The ratepayers can pay and Matteo and I can bank, and the Squadron will back me up on this. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Leftred 26 Posted September 29, 2022 Share Posted September 29, 2022 I have a lot of respect for what Dalts has achieved in his own racing and with ETNZ. However, language like that "talk to someone sensible" reminds me of a bully who is used to getting their own way. As you said, the ratepayers will likely foot the bill, and if indeed the city holds the risk then I'd support anyone who tells him to get stuffed. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.