Jump to content

UN latest climate outlook


Recommended Posts

Heartland Institute = Koch Brothers. Nuff said.

Is that fact or fiction?  Where's the supporting evidence, you know the stuff you often call for from others?

 

 

If you like I can point you to the very spots that have what you need. I've already been there done that, it's climate change sussing 101.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Lots of both sided arguments, and the thread was started I believe by suggesting that global warming was being caused by population increase. Whether that is true or not, the elephant in the room, wh

Wowwwww.... this Michael Shellenberger dude a brave bastard coming out and more so speaking out but one in a growing trend coming out saying the same thing....not that the mass public are allowed to k

I work with some now young adults and they take those up/down tickie things incredibly seriously and references to them do come up in suicide notes. As BP has said he doesn't understand them that mean

Posted Images

 It's not the sun causing the warming either through Milankovitch cycles or sunspots, it's not from volcanic activity, it's not from more human bodies warming the place up, it's not from the earths center. So where is it coming from? Or do you think it's not warming at all? If so why are the glaciers melting and the polar ice mass reducing along with Greenland's?

 Is there any viable alternative to CO2 that hasn't been exhaustively researched and discarded?

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2013/oct/21/china-pollution

 

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/16/iran-mps-wear-medical-face-masks-to-protest-air-pollution

 

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jul/27/greenland-ice-sheet-melt

 

 US Navy predicts summer ice free Arctic North Pole by leap year 2016
The paper is highly critical of global climate models (GCM) and even
the majority of regional models, noting that "many Arctic climatic
processes that are omitted from, or poorly represented in, most
current-generation GCMs " which "do not account for important feedbacks
among various system components." In operation on this Planet


Last year Prof Duarte was lead author of a paper in the Royal Swedish
Academy of Science's journal AMBIO warning that the Arctic was at risk
of passing critical "tipping points" that could lead to a cascading
"domino effect once the summer sea ice is lost."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/oct/03/ocean-acidification-carbon-dioxide-emissions-levels

 

 http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/climate-change-companies-supply-chain-impact     

 

 

 

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/22/climate-change-deniers-have-won-global-warming   

 

 

 

 

TO BE ABLE TO ACTUALLY PASS ON TO THE NEXT GENERATION THIS NON REPLACEABLE PLANET WITH A MORE CLEANER AND MORE PURER, TOXIC FREE, POLLUTION FREE ENVIRONMENT ALL BUSINESSES , CORPORATIONS, GOVERNMENTS AND CITY ADMINISTRATORS MUST ALL REALISE THAT THEIR NON ACTIONS, THEIR DELAYING DECISIONS AT PRESENT HAVE A GREAT DEVASTATING EFFECT ON OUR PLANET EARTHS FUTURE SO THEY MUST ALL MAKE A MORE DETERMINED EFFORT TO PRESERVE THE AIR MASSES, WATER, FLORNA, SEAS, OCEANS, WATER MASSES, WATERWAYS, RAIN FORESTS, NATIVE FORESTS THAN WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN DOING AND WHAT THEY ARE DOING NOW.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it even matter WHY the ice caps and glaciers are melting - plainly the fact that they ARE is what is important.

 

Certainly, if there is anything we can do that MIGHT make a difference in retaining the greatest biodiversity that we possibly can on this non-disposable planet, our home, we should be doing it.

 

It is almost like all this debate over who did or did not do what is just a smoke screen to keep the non-sentient inhabitants of humanoid bodies happily removing and replacing rather than repairing . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_climate_change_science

It's from wikipedia so some might want to get their tin foil hats out but it's interesting how far back CO2 was identified as a significant greenhouse gas and mans contribution to the release of it. In 1896 a guy worked out that doubling the CO2 would increase the temperature by 5-6C and halving it would induce an ice age.

 

So KMm what do you believe? Is it not happening or is it something that is either being ignored or is it something undiscovered?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...