Jump to content

Yacht missing around Gisbourne


JK

Recommended Posts

Hmm... perhaps an enquiry to Coastguard regarding their policies in such matters would be in order.

 

On a completely unrelated note, I seem to recall some recent interest on their part in knowing why more people don't join.

 

CG was the transport, as someone else said, they don't have the authority but are helping out the body that does, 

 

Don't dump on CG for what isn't their issue 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CG was the transport, as someone else said, they don't have the authority but are helping out the body that does,

 

Don't dump on CG for what isn't their issue

 

So CG were only supplying the transport for the kidnapping then. Oh, that makes it alright.

 

I was only the get away driver, wasn't me robbing the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Herald is desperate to sell papers that's why most front pages have stuff fuelling the housing debacle.

As for this story - they should leave the guy alone. He has done amazingly to make that trip around the feared East Cape and must have struck some reasonably big seas. It sounds like he possibly was under prepared but he has not requested help from anyone and will have learnt heaps from the experience. Back to basics sailing - I like it, reminds me of being warned not to leave Tutukaka in a strong NE many moons ago in a Stilletto also with little experience and no communications - we had a ball sliding down the waves all the way to Auckland.

These days we do have more"safety" gear but still believe in self reliance and generally never bother with trip reports.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More alternative media:

. crikey.com.au led the online push in Australia/NZ

. http://publicaddress.net/

. The Young Turks - biggest online news service in the world

. privately curated twitter feeds

the list goes on. I am proud to say I have not bought a newspaper since about 1995 when things like this began to start up on the internet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read the act again. What he needs is a sympathetic lawyer to lodge an urgent appeal in the district court down there. That'll then force MNZ to send their highly paid legal beagles rushing up from wellywood in their maseratis!

Link to post
Share on other sites

to me this story sounds like the guy didn't call in when he was supposed to (for whatever reason, dead battery etc), this raised an alarm which resulted in a "nationwide" search. the guy was found and seemed to be ok. Then for some reason some journo got hold of this story and escalated it. It came out that he was inexperienced, he still hadn't checked in and so another search was done to locate him. again he was found and still seemed to be ok, just no comms. Then I think this is where it got out of hand. the journo reported that 2 searches had been conducted however the guy will not be charged for the cost.( the outrage that us hardworking people paying taxes has to pick up this bill)  at this point MNZ has to go to damage control and issue statements such as "we dont want to put people off using our services" however some members of the hard tax paying public will be complaining because why is an inexperienced guy allowed to go out. So to save face, MNZ have had to make a show of "doing" something to stop wasting money on this guy and imposed section 55 which if you read it is so generic that right now he could be allowed to carry on his travels. all he needs is proof of communications 1x radio and 1 x mobile phone is more than enough and show he has had his battery issue resolved. and prove he is able to to sail, the CG even commented that he has experience now. how can you prove you are able to sail in this country, there is no license and you do not have  to do any skipper course for coastal sailing. 

 

the problem here is the journo who needs to make a living and ensure his/her story sells, so embellish the story and pushes the "hard" question. 

 

the next thing to happen will be, he will be allowed to leave having "satisfied" MNZ section 55 in a few days, the journo will do a follow up piece showing his boatmaster certificate, and his new battery, solar panel, and vhf, all of which will probably be payed for by CG. and say we have the best system in the world because we have not charged this young sailor and helped him to achieve his dream (but cost the public even more money) 

 

i am pretty sure he will change his plan now and tell his mates, he will call them once a week to avoid future issues. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

. And then even though he was safely anchored at Whale Island, they forced him instead to cross the "notorious Whakatane bar."

In a "gusty northeasterly" what is more. Not the conditions i'd choose to enter whakatane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And if a Harbourmaster has the power to do this then why the hell aren't they utilising this section when some of our "peers" in the stinkpot world set off in small ships, overweight with no lifejackets!

Case in point: two guys were rescued after capsizing a 5m tinnie at the maketu bar in the weekend heading out in "harsh conditions" to set a net.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I don't know all the legal ins and outs, but possibly registering the vessel offshore would limit interference in one's nautical activities by all these governmental busybodies. It's something I am looking into.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And while we'are at it, whatever happened to interfering with a vessel going about her lawful occasions and under command of her legally appointed master being considered an act of piracy?

Or is this yet another right surrendered to this 'we know what's best for you' state?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I don't know all the legal ins and outs, but possibly registering the vessel offshore would limit interference in one's nautical activities by all these governmental busybodies.

Nope, that's the one they use to stop the wayward boaters like the dude up north a year or so back, amongst others. It's a catch all not well defined on purpose law i.e. can be used easily to give the authorities at least a few days of wiggle room while everyone tries to work out WTF? Just as it is being used now by the looks.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Now I don't know all the legal ins and outs, but possibly registering the vessel offshore would limit interference in one's nautical activities by all these governmental busybodies. It's something I am looking into.

 

That was the thinking I had in my mind when I asked earlier about whether MNZ had that kind of power over a non Cat compliant vessel. If it does, then MNZ need to have a man down at every ramp in the Country to stop any one they think doesn't have enough experience to operate a Boat. Thye better have a damn big carpark to put them all in and the following weekend is going to be quite out on the water.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does not matter what flag you carry. Within territorial waters, authorities of that nation have the right to board, direct to Port, inspect, and if breaking any law, impound, or fine any vessel. They can also oblige it to leave their territory...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...