erice 322 Posted July 4, 2019 Report Share Posted July 4, 2019 Cash-strapped Coastguard New Zealand believes lives will be put at risk if it is forced to pay a levy to the Government. The coastal search and rescue charity needs $20 million a year to keep its patrol vessels afloat. It receives 12.5 per cent of that from the Government and fund raises the rest. But as of 1 July it has a new bill in its in-tray. Coastguard NZ has been asked to pay the maritime levy, which it calculates will costs it another $20,000 a year. Maritime New Zealand said the charity was being asked to pay the annual fee as it is classified under the law as a 'commercial' operation not 'recreational' - the only two categories available. Historically the charge had been waived, but Maritime New Zealand director Keith Manch wants all organisations categorised 'commercial' to pay the levy, whether or not they are actually a business. As part of the recent funding review, consideration was given to whether that arrangement [the waiver] should be formalised. However, the Government decided that this would not happen https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/left-perish-lack-support-coastguard-national-disgrace Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Black Panther 648 Posted July 4, 2019 Report Share Posted July 4, 2019 0.1% of their budget. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
armchairadmiral 262 Posted July 4, 2019 Report Share Posted July 4, 2019 This so called Government are a bunch of incompetent twits.They are not in control of NZ. The bureaucrats are . That it has got this far is proof. Understand next on the list are Yacht Club patrol boats. And another 17 months of them to go ....plus who's going to replace them ? L00seM00se, jim s and Battleship 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
waikiore 62 Posted July 4, 2019 Report Share Posted July 4, 2019 Keith Manch at his best Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sabre 336 Posted July 4, 2019 Report Share Posted July 4, 2019 ***Maritime New Zealand said the charity was being asked to pay the annual fee as it is classified under the law as a 'commercial' operation not 'recreational' - the only two categories available.*** So all they really need is a third category on their clipboard to tick.. just going to throw it out there but maybe call it non commercial? Seems a shame that coastguard have to cough up 20k because some pointy headed clipboard wielding halfwit has contracted OCD. zk-cessnaguy and jim s 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The big T 14 Posted July 4, 2019 Report Share Posted July 4, 2019 Balance the equation. Coastguard used to comprise of volunteer boats and crews who dedicated a large amount of time, effort and probably personal finance to provide a great service which, in my memory, was largely found not to be wanting. Volunteer boats used to strategically place themselves around the gulf at crucial times, hence the Coastguard moorings in a lot of prime anchorages. Timely and efficient assistance could be given at a reasonable cost. Coastguard chose to become more professional with dedicated rescue vessels and professionally qualified skippers (needed if boats were considered "commercial") The volunteer boats were squeezed out. Can only talk about Auckland with any knowledge. Maybe Coastguard can't have it both ways. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
grant 17 Posted July 5, 2019 Report Share Posted July 5, 2019 Balance the equation. Coastguard used to comprise of volunteer boats and crews who dedicated a large amount of time, effort and probably personal finance to provide a great service which, in my memory, was largely found not to be wanting. Volunteer boats used to strategically place themselves around the gulf at crucial times, hence the Coastguard moorings in a lot of prime anchorages. Timely and efficient assistance could be given at a reasonable cost. Coastguard chose to become more professional with dedicated rescue vessels and professionally qualified skippers (needed if boats were considered "commercial") The volunteer boats were squeezed out. Can only talk about Auckland with any knowledge. Maybe Coastguard can't have it both ways. The volunteer boats where used in a non-personal way and so were considered as commercial. Dedicated boats enabled better equipment levels and training which was good. The costs of dedicated boats has continued to increase. The fact most of them have been required to get passenger survey is, in my opinion, ridiculous and I suspect adds more in fees that this latest fee hike has. If they are paying an additional $20,000 I wonder what the base level of fees is..... Good luck to them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin McCready 27 Posted July 5, 2019 Report Share Posted July 5, 2019 It's much less costly in administration to avoid all sorts of exceptions to the rule. Also coast guard is not a democratic organisation - "members" don't get to vote harrytom and Island Time 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
harrytom 259 Posted July 5, 2019 Report Share Posted July 5, 2019 Well close coastguard down then let's see what it costs the Govt to provide the services coastguard provide. Fish and Veladare 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
KM... 820 Posted July 5, 2019 Report Share Posted July 5, 2019 Another case of bullshit poor, at best, subject knowledge bureaucracy winning over common sense. The same retarded twats that had a similar go at the rescue helicopters around the country. The choppers who save the heath departments many millions by being there in the golden hour, very much like and often in hand with Coastguard. harrytom, Fish and Sabre 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.