Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ello ello.. No I don't use Dux. I prefer other versions of that sort of SK75's which are more consistent and often cheaper like Ocean 12 HS or been using a bit of DF78 lately (which is a SK78). Dux is most prominent due to better marketing than better performance. Dynex and Dynex Dux seem to be the 'fad' default at the moment. There are a lot of other ropes just the same made by other people, Dynex and Dux are far from unique. It's knot bad but I just think there is better.

 

It'll quickly lose about 10% of it's max load from UV then the degrading will slow dramatically as long as you don't knock the outside off it. It gets a, for lack of better word, oxidised layer on the outside after the UV has got at it but that layer then becomes almost a sunscreen which saves the rest of it.

 

Standing rigging?? If you have lots of coin, don't mind tweaking the stretching out reasonably often and don't mind carrying extra windage aloft, yes why knot. It does have upsides as well like lower weight aloft and a few things.

 

There are a few boats around NZ using it and it seems to be doing OK but all (the rigging) is reasonably new so a bit of a time will tell thing going on. Also all or at least most of the boats using it are racers sailed by people who know what they are looking at and how to play with it better than most boaters.

 

Yes there are some real flash boats using fibre type rigging but that stuff they are using isn't off-the-shelf Dynex or similar and is replaced often.

 

I'm still to be convinced that for the average Joe Blow fibre better than wire currently. I'm very sure wire is on the out and the fibre on the way in but there still needs to be a bit more work done before fibre is 100% the better option. I'm also knot sure but trying to suss whether the lower weight is knot being negated by the large increase in drag, a lot of these ropes aren't wire type smooth so will have big drag.

 

At least one of the people using said Dynex probably won't agree with me and he isn't a un-informed dork (or at least any more or less than most of us 99% of the time) but that does show how there is still more work to be done before a reasonable consensus of people agree it is good or bad.

 

That's me thinking......... and it hurt :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You adjust the backstay in anyway?

Any ariel involved?

 

Leaning towards fibre but need to consider the creep. Vectran probably, knot so creepy as Dynex, Dux and the other SK75's. Real tight pic cover to minimise size (windage) and give nice abrasion/UV protection.

Link to post
Share on other sites
So what would you recommend for a standing backstay on our dinosaur KM. Stick with wire or something else?

 

 

Its a shame the post with all the discussion about Dynex that Squid started hasn't been requoted.

 

We use Dynex on Sidestays, runners, Topmast Backstays, Bobstay, and Prod Sidestays.

It is bloody fantastic.

We are dealing with wide stay angles in the applications we use and we can handle a small 1-1.5% of possible stretch.

We pre stretch it before we use it.

 

There aren't many leaners that would get away with it on a topmast backstay, as a small amount of stretch on a narrow stay angle would be a bad thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a wild assumption Murky.......... but a good one :)

 

What I've been saying is just what Wolf has, that being 'horses for courses'.

 

Been trying to suss just which Dino is Willows actually. Couldn't remember hence the questions :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of KM biggest problems w Dynex was to do with some very extravagant claims about its Break strength.

 

I have since done some testing on Dynex and Oceans 75.

 

If you knew what I did you would never use Oceans 75, ask the This Way up guys about their prod !

Although it breaks at a high load it stretches like buggery on the way. Prestrectching it achieves precisely nothing.

 

Once Dynex is pre stretched properly, it doesn't really stretch much until it reaches the load at which it was prestretched.

 

The break loads of Dynex, while incredible, on 4 5 and 6 mm are all accurate.

The stretch figure of 6% at break is very hard to measure, but it is believable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...