Posted 03 August 2019 - 09:01 AM
Posted 04 August 2019 - 07:10 PM
Don't be so short sighted, that area will continue to benefit Auckland for a long time after the cup, as per the viaduct.
Posted 05 August 2019 - 07:24 AM
I agree, as long as its a public benefit. Lost in all the smoke is who gets the sweet deals on the land/buildings/leases when the games are over. Prefer my rates didnt end up as corporate welfare for a tiny boys club.
"Never argue with a fool; onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain
Posted 05 August 2019 - 07:48 AM
Yeah there has to be a distinction between the cup event expenditure and long term benefit expenditure. Sadly we aren't provided it
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users