Jump to content


Refund Please

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Priscilla II

Priscilla II

    Advanced Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,518 posts

Posted 03 August 2019 - 09:01 AM

The $37 million of scarce public loot need not of have been spent on the Prada base platform seeing realistically only 3 contenders are likely to rock up.
  • -2

#2 Ed


    Advanced Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 561 posts

Posted 04 August 2019 - 07:10 PM

Don't be so short sighted, that area will continue to benefit Auckland for a long time after the cup, as per the viaduct. 

  • 0

#3 Maté



  • Marine Forums Only
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,699 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 07:24 AM

I agree, as long as its a public benefit. Lost in all the smoke is who gets the sweet deals on the land/buildings/leases when the games are over. Prefer my rates didnt end up as corporate welfare for a tiny boys club.

  • 1

"Never argue with a fool; onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain

#4 Puff


    Advanced Member

  • Marine Forums Only
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,926 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 07:48 AM

Yeah there has to be a distinction between the cup event expenditure and long term benefit expenditure. Sadly we aren't provided it

  • 0

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users