eruptn 103 Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 Interesting read this morning; https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12256972 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
twisty 176 Posted August 10, 2019 Share Posted August 10, 2019 I think the barge thing is a bit of a smoke screen. Even if it happens it will be years away. Resource consent to dredge Tamaki River ? I think the biggest thing is when Wilson points out that the cruise ships could use Bledisloe wharf more or less already. I think the problem is POAL's empire building ethos. The dolphins look like a dead dog now thank god. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
armchairadmiral 411 Posted August 10, 2019 Share Posted August 10, 2019 If I didn't know better I'd think there was an election coming up. Goff's had 3 years to do something here to get rid of the cars. Like his Guvmit mates they are only in office to feather their own nests and gouge the trough of the public purse....and yes,yes ,that's all Guvmits ! 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frank 161 Posted August 10, 2019 Share Posted August 10, 2019 American english ! the correct spelling is Gummint , as in Gummint this and Gummint that Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JK 28 Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Think it was just lobbed out there to distract people. A 250 vehicle barge would be way bigger than existing Waiheke car ferries which only go up the river as far as just past the marina or maybe 40% of the distance. Getting something larger around the doglegs in the channel which can be challenging for a Piedy at low tide would require a serious amount of dredging, especially given much of the area above the bridges is only 2-3m depth. Then they have the small problem of getting under the old Panmure bridge which at best would impose tide state conditions with its 7.7m of clearance. Or, would they remove the old Panmure Bridge along with the new one they are putting alongside it to host the bus lanes on? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
El Toro 110 Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Plus about another twenty reasons this is horseshit 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Priscilla II 417 Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 POAL hold a consent for the 5 storey car handling facility at Bledisloe and I believe Hawkins is piling as we speak. Darned near impossible to find any decent drawings of it so I assume another brutal Soviet styled structure so it does not conflict with all the other crap architecture that adorns the waterfront. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rangi1 51 Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 The POAL carpark is three stories high already. They really have managed to keep it on the quiet while pushing ahead at full steam. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
khayyam 99 Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Does seem unlikely. Too bad, as it would be better not to be unloading the cars there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
El Toro 110 Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 They were still going to unload the cars on wharf Quote Link to post Share on other sites
El Toro 110 Posted August 13, 2019 Share Posted August 13, 2019 Only the top story will be for public space, which kind if defeats the whole purpose of building it..but the other 4 will be for cars...and since they already have the bottom story, they are gaining very little given one needs sorting areas next to the building. "Its political" is the best reply Ive had from people who are more in the know Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.