ex Elly 116 Posted October 11, 2021 Share Posted October 11, 2021 $300m Bayswater Marina scheme out for public notification - documents on council site Plans for the $300 million 121-apartment project at Bayswater Marina have today been publicly notified. Auckland Council's website now shows the details of the scheme for the North Shore land owned by Bayswater Marina Holdings, part of Simon and Paula Herbert's Empire Capital business. Application is being made for resource consent to redevelop the existing marina reclamation land with public open spaces, landscaping, apartments, terraced housing, commercial activities and parking in the Bayswater maritime precinct. The master plan, architectural plans for the apartments, landscape plans, a high analysis, geotechnical investigations, acoustic and transport assessments, a report on construction, stormwater outfalls, and engineering drawings are all now available to view. Plans posted today show courtyards in the middle of apartment blocks, but instead of being landscaped as they are in many other projects, these have car parks at their heart. Chris Darby, a North Shore councillor and planning committee chairman, said genuine community engagement was being sought from the developer. [...] Darby encouraged Herbert to visit the best waterfront developments overseas and said that Herbert had done that. Plans are for 94 terraced homes and 27 apartments in three buildings. Around 350 people could live on the site under the revised plan, the application says. Existing marina berthage areas will be untouched and associated car parking and marine-related commercial activities will be upgraded. The Bayswater Community Committee said last month it would undertake an online survey asking about the proposed development, what people value and what they want. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/300m-bayswater-marina-scheme-out-for-public-notification-documents-on-council-site/HRX2PHVHHB3MFOYHAVBZJJBIR4/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dutyfree 142 Posted October 11, 2021 Share Posted October 11, 2021 I think Herbert is overseas already, I am sure he is visiting any tax deductible site he can............... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
otto 2 Posted October 21, 2021 Share Posted October 21, 2021 I hope every one is looking at what is proposed and that there will be objections and lots of. "associated car parking and marine-related commercial activities will be upgraded" all existing marine related activities are gone and only retail type industries will possibly be in the new development. The boat ramp will now be unusable for most if not all and trailer parks are basically gone. Unless it's a jet ski as that's about all that will fit. While the majority of current users are power boats this also rules out the kids training with 470's and there coach boats which are often down there. Here's a petition which would be great if more signed, if you do add a comment as well if possible. https://www.change.org/saveourrampandforeshore Another option is to support the local berth holders association which is looking at challenging. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bad Kitty 191 Posted October 21, 2021 Share Posted October 21, 2021 Herbert has no interest in marine, just property & money. Tosser! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
waikiore 249 Posted October 21, 2021 Share Posted October 21, 2021 The well known jetski boy -caught speeding near the shore by police a few years back. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
alibaba 37 Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 Let's see, some simple[?] arithmetic. This development is not being done by one developer with half a dozen trucks etc. It's being sold as approx 90 odd separate lots, for individual builders. If we assume reasonably, that each builder will bring at least a truck and a ute to the build - which seems to be my observation of what is going on in my street - that means a minimum of 180 vehicles on site each day. Where will they park? That means on average - neglecting peak times, a truck movement every 90 seconds. Add in the delivery hiabs with precast materials and timber?? I'm not saying this development cannot go ahead, but not in this format. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.