Jump to content

William C Daldy.


Recommended Posts

I'm pretty left leaning in general (sorry) but the idea that the tiny pin prick of emissions from heritage machinery should change their operation because of climate change considerations seems ridiculous to me. Although I've shovelled many tons of coal into 100+ year-old boilers over the years so I'm biased.

Making any heritage steam operation work financially is very very difficult. Most volunteer rail operations are struggling to keep their steam locomotives running, except for a handful of very well run ones like Steam Incorporated out of Wellington. Add the complexity of hull maintenance, survey requirements, compliance costs etc, it must be very very difficult to keep a steam vessel operating, Earnslaw being the only successful one I can think of.

  • Upvote 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe stop poking funds in the SS Toroa at Lincoln Rd and get the willie c back to operation.Went pass the toroa today trying to be polite here but shes stuffed. Should of kept the Makora but she is under the motorway extension at St marys bay.

Could convert her oil burning but why would you,the amount of emmisions verses the smoke etc from volcanoes/rotorua/wairaki is minimal. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Steam engines and the like are fascinating engineering marvels and were fundamental to our progress as a society. I love seeing them at places like Motat. But it is beyound me how to save this boat. As we all know the cost of maintenance of any boat is increasing alarmingly. Keeping a very old steel boat up to scratch would be a phenomenal job, let alone trying to run it on coal. 

Are you even allowed to purchase coal in NZ anymore? And if you are, where can you get it from? I assume it's not held in stock at Farmlands, Z energy or Meridian Energy?

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, waikiore said:

Well K4309 we are importing over 500T of coal each week to charge the Teslas so yes it is available , (from my POA contacts) just not so much high quality Westport coal as the old days.

Well there you go. I'm sure a bit for an old steam boat wont make a jot of difference to the next flood / cyclone / atmospheric river / polar jet stream or what ever normal weather even the mainstream media try to scare us with.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Leftred said:

I'm pretty left leaning in general (sorry) but the idea that the tiny pin prick of emissions from heritage machinery should change their operation because of climate change considerations seems ridiculous to me. Although I've shovelled many tons of coal into 100+ year-old boilers over the years so I'm biased.

Making any heritage steam operation work financially is very very difficult. Most volunteer rail operations are struggling to keep their steam locomotives running, except for a handful of very well run ones like Steam Incorporated out of Wellington. Add the complexity of hull maintenance, survey requirements, compliance costs etc, it must be very very difficult to keep a steam vessel operating, Earnslaw being the only successful one I can think of.

And Real Journeys are looking at changing from coal to green energy power for Earnslaw.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, waikiore said:

Well K4309 we are importing over 500T of coal each week to charge the Teslas so yes it is available , (from my POA contacts) just not so much high quality Westport coal as the old days.

Well actually no.

https://www.newsroom.co.nz/coal-use-plummets-to-32-year-low

It's a shame there really is no logical "outing" trip for the Daldy like Walter Peak down south for the Earnslaw. Too slow for even Waiheke. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting back to the Daldy, I agree a bit of coal is not going to make a difference to climate, these old girls do have a use by date where the costs just get to much though: It needs drydocking bi-annually at a cost of 200-250k, it uses about a ton of coal an hour to run (350 a ton?) If they can get the support why not keep her going? Steam gives a lot of pleasure to people, Glenbrook is very popular

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Psyche said:

Getting back to the Daldy, I agree a bit of coal is not going to make a difference to climate, these old girls do have a use by date where the costs just get to much though: It needs drydocking bi-annually at a cost of 200-250k, it uses about a ton of coal an hour to run (350 a ton?) If they can get the support why not keep her going? Steam gives a lot of pleasure to people, Glenbrook is very popular

 

I'd be interested to go and have a look at the engine room just as a static display. That isn't possible at the moment is it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My family own a traction engine, and just running that isn't cheap. I don't know the exact numbers but a day's hard running on the road only burns a couple hundred kilos of coal. I hate to think of the cost of running a fairly large steel steam ship. At least with a rail locomotive you can park it for a few years and it doesn't really deteriorate.

I have always wanted to spend some time on a shovel in the engine room of a steam ship though... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Leftred said:

My family own a traction engine, and just running that isn't cheap. I don't know the exact numbers but a day's hard running on the road only burns a couple hundred kilos of coal. I hate to think of the cost of running a fairly large steel steam ship. At least with a rail locomotive you can park it for a few years and it doesn't really deteriorate.

I have always wanted to spend some time on a shovel in the engine room of a steam ship though... 

That is certainly a problem with the WC Daldy... constant exposure to the corrosive marine environment. The Earnslaw has the benefit of living in freshwater with minimal corrosion. That said, the Earnslaw was suffering from corrosion from the inside out, in the area of the boilers where the sulfur from the coal formed acids. There was also a lot of corrosion from the stock carrying days when the bilges were contaminated with stock urine. Back around 2003, we replaced a good measure of the hull plating, welding in new sections. Interesting that the original steel for plating and rivets was the same vintage as the Titanic but was made in Australia. When I some etched and analysed it we found the Australian product was good and ductile, and not suffering from the same brittleness as the steel used for the Titanic. 

Another interesting trivia from those days...  removed plating had clear un-corroded numbers written on them. These were identifying plate numbers from the yard in Dunedin where see was built (Disassembled and reassembled in Kingston)... the numbers had been painted on using white lead paint.

Shoveling coal?... the Earnslaw is one ton per hour if you are up to it... good exercise. There was talk back then of changing away from coal however there were concerns around the effect that a higher temp lean burning fuel would have on the old riveted locomotive  boilers. I know the old paddle steamer on Lake Geneva has converted away from coal, but I do not know if the original boilers were replaced.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...