Jump to content

Cancel your Great Barrier plans this Summer


Recommended Posts

On 9/12/2023 at 9:50 AM, CarpeDiem said:

Its primary mechanism of reproduction is asexual, which is caused by fragmentation.  Sexual reproduction causes the Caulerpa plant to die completely. The plant has to be already on its way out for it to initiate sexual reproduction. Our Caulerpa is young healthy vibrant... 

That's ironic.  Exact opposite of humans.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/12/2023 at 7:27 PM, darkside said:

We were out at the Barrier last night. A trailer boat was anchored and diving for crays next to Bowling Alley Bay. Can't imagine how they will achieve anywhere near 100% compliance 

Just flew over yesterday and it's not just tinnies and fizz boats...

 

20231217_173316.jpg

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's hope...  Glad to see that, despite our collective cynicism about govt agencies they have been working on something. 

Now about the Hauraki gulf...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw that in omakiwi last week. Wasn't sure whats going on!

Glad they're doing something, given the CAN. There were 50 boats on opunga in 20-30 SE with omakiwi off limits.

Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, khayyam said:

Saw that in omakiwi last week. Wasn't sure whats going on!

Glad they're doing something, given the CAN. There were 50 boats on opunga in 20-30 SE with omakiwi off limits.

It appears the CAN allows you to anchor in Omakiwi in that situation. Same as the Gt Barrier CAN

Anchoring is permitted without the need to acquire a permit for the following situations: (1) In the event of an emergency that:

c. no other alternative safe sheltering locations or mooring can be easily acquired.

Te Rāwhiti Caulerpa Controlled Area Notice 2023 (mpi.govt.nz)

The CAN also states you don't need a permit to leave the area if you anchored under Schedule 2, 1c.

The whole idea of these can's is to stop the spread. Most of the enthuses is on not taking actual caulerpa out, then, on not taking seafood etc and on cleaning fishing, diving gear and what not.

Just anchoring is going to have negligible effect. And the CAN allows you to do that in certain situations. Not being able to easily acquire a safe anchorage is grounds for anchoring inside the CAN.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18/12/2023 at 11:17 AM, motorb said:

Just flew over yesterday and it's not just tinnies and fizz boats...

 

20231217_173316.jpg

Why do you think they aren't allowed there?

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, K4309 said:

It appears the CAN allows you to anchor in Omakiwi in that situation. Same as the Gt Barrier CAN

Anchoring is permitted without the need to acquire a permit for the following situations: (1) In the event of an emergency that:

c. no other alternative safe sheltering locations or mooring can be easily acquired.

Te Rāwhiti Caulerpa Controlled Area Notice 2023 (mpi.govt.nz)

The CAN also states you don't need a permit to leave the area if you anchored under Schedule 2, 1c.

The whole idea of these can's is to stop the spread. Most of the enthuses is on not taking actual caulerpa out, then, on not taking seafood etc and on cleaning fishing, diving gear and what not.

Just anchoring is going to have negligible effect. And the CAN allows you to do that in certain situations. Not being able to easily acquire a safe anchorage is grounds for anchoring inside the CAN.

Yeah I'm aware. Depends on one's definition of "easily" and "safe". A roll, for example, is uncomfortable but probably safe? In any event, people seemed not to be using that clause. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 26/01/2024 at 3:24 PM, K4309 said:

Why do you think they aren't allowed there?

Because they were anchored within the CAN area.... the thing they aren't allowed to do in the area they're doing it....

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, motorb said:

Because they were anchored within the CAN area.... the thing they aren't allowed to do in the area they're doing it....

If you read the CAN notice, you will see that it says you can anchor in the CAN area. Under certain circumstances.

It isn't possible to know that by flying over and going tut tut.

It is getting to the point of spreading mis-information on this forum that you can't anchor in a CAN area.

You can.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, waikiore said:

They need to get over it , all the fan worm has disappeared from my Westhaven pier?

Fanworm is a complety different pest, and since the freshwater cleared most of it out in Jan 2023, in 2024 I've noticed it making a comeback on U pier.

It's a shame to see it growing again without intervention since nature gave the marina a big hand in managing it there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather than stupid xxx xxxx the country can't afford  -- put a couple hundred $million into building a dozen of these machine and just go to town on this caulerpa.  It sure beats trying to enforce stupid anchoring bans which no ones takes notice of anyway https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/ldr/508904/70-boats-illegally-anchored-in-bay-of-islands-caulerpa-ban-area-over-summer

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly the suction dredge addresses the primary issue of caulerpa in that it smoothers everything. Obviously these are trials at the moment, but you would expect that if you physically remove the smothering caulerpa the rest of the benthic environment will bounce back. It may be like kaykuya (spelling, the grass that grows well in coastal environments). Near impossible to permanently eradicate, but perfectly manageable if you give it a regular mow and weed-eat it once a month.

There is nothing technically complex or particularly expensive about the dredge. A long reach digger, probably 20t at least, a road sweeper head, geo-cloth bag, some regular de-watering suction pumps and pipes, and of course a barge. I don't know what the capital value of that stuff is, but it appears the operating cost is moderately low. One or two staff, a support boat (for getting to the barge) and diesel.

I'd like to think the $5mil would get two or three of these barges going. Start doing a circuit of known spots and 'mow down' the caulerpa. My fear is the $5mil will be used for hui, community consultation, cultural impact reports and what not. We can only hope the dredging is deemed effective, or at least cost-effective (assuming it is moderately cheap) and they push on with it, along with lifting the porous anchoring bans which are ineffective and have a number of exclusions anyway.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...